CO129-459 - Individuals - 1919 — Page 72

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

IN THE PRIVY COUNCIL.

Appeal No. 39 of 1919.

ON APPEAL from the SUPREME COURT OF HONG KONG Appellate Jurisdiction.

BETWEEN LI HONG (Plaintiff) Appellant and THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL and the Hon. Mr Edwin Richard Hallifax and the Hon Mr Charles McIlvaine Messer (Defendants) Respondents.

1. This is an appeal from the judgment of the Supreme Court of Hong Kong dismissing an action brought by the Appellant who was Plaintiff in the action against the Respondents who were Defendants in the action.

2. The action was brought by the Appellant in respect of a deportation order made against the Appellant under the Deportation Ordinance 1917 (No. 25 of 1917). The Respondent the Attorney-General was sued as representing the Crown, the Respondent the Hon. Mr Edwin Richard Hallifax as the Secretary for Chinese Affairs and as a Member of the Executive Council, and the Respondent the Hon. Mr Charles McIlvaine Messer as the Captain Superintendent of Police, Superintendent of Victoria.

Edit History

2026-06-14 06:02:00 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
IN THE PRIVY COUNCIL.Appeal No. 39 of 1919.ON APPEAL from the SUPREME COURT OF HONG KONG Appellate Jurisdiction.BETWEEN LI HONG (Plaintiff) Appellant and THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL and the Hon. Mr Edwin Richard Hallifax and the Hon Mr Charles McIlvaine Messer (Defendants) Respondents.1. This is an appeal from the judgment of the Supreme Court of Hong Kong dismissing an action brought by the Appellant who was Plaintiff in the action against the Respondents who were Defendants in the action.2. The action was brought by the Appellant in respect of a deportation order made against the Appellant under the Deportation Ordinance 1917 (No. 25 of 1917). The Respondent the Attorney-General was sued as representing the Crown, the Respondent the Hon. Mr Edwin Richard Hallifax as the Secretary for Chinese Affairs and as a Member of the Executive Council, and the Respondent the Hon. Mr Charles McIlvaine Messer as the Captain Superintendent of Police, Superintendent of Victoria.
Baseline (Original)
* to„Ede, Amanent ban osa:17.12nam thần b thầnSaot 17Consultation MeFriskyIN THE PRIVY COUNCIL.avitust701Appeal No. 39 of 1919.ON APPEAL from the SUPREME COURT OF HONG KONG Appellate Jurisdiction.BETWERK LI HONGT (Plaintiff) Appellant and THE ATTORNKY-GENERAL and the Hon. Mr Edwin Richard Hallifax and the Hon HT Charles McIlvaine Messer (Defendats)CA SfortheRESPONDENTS+Respondents,1. This is an appeal from the judgment of the Supreme Court of Hong Kong dismissing an action brought by the Appellant who was Plaintiff in the action against the Respondents who wereto qundersen Defendants in the action.2. The action was brought by the Appellant in respect of a deportation order made against the Appellant under the Deporta-tion Ordinance 1917 (No. 25 of 1917). The Respondent the Attorney-Generalwas sued as representing the Crown, the Respondent the Hon. Kr Edwin Richard Hallifax as the Secretary for Chinese Affairs and as a Member of the Executive Council. and the Respondent the Ron. Mr Charles McIlvaine Kosaar as the Captain Superintendent of Polios, Superintendent of Victoria1.
2026-06-14 06:02:00 · Baseline
View content

* to

„Ede, Amanent ban osa:

17.12

nam thần b thần

Saot 17

Consultation Me

Frisky

IN THE PRIVY COUNCIL.

avitust

701

Appeal No. 39 of 1919.

ON APPEAL from the SUPREME COURT OF HONG KONG

Appellate Jurisdiction.

BETWERK

LI HONG

T

(Plaintiff)

Appellant

and

THE ATTORNKY-GENERAL and the Hon.

Mr Edwin Richard Hallifax and the

Hon HT Charles McIlvaine Messer

(Defendats)

CA S

for

the

RESPONDENTS

+

Respondents,

1.

This is an appeal from the judgment of the Supreme

Court

of Hong Kong dismissing an action brought by the Appellant who

was Plaintiff in the action against the Respondents who were

to qundersen

Defendants in the action.

2.

The action was brought by the Appellant in respect of a

deportation order made against the Appellant under the Deporta-

tion Ordinance 1917 (No. 25 of 1917). The Respondent the

Attorney-Generalwas sued as representing the Crown,

the Respon

dent the Hon. Kr Edwin Richard Hallifax as the Secretary for

Chinese Affairs and as a Member of the Executive Council.

and

the Respondent the Ron. Mr Charles McIlvaine Kosaar as the

Captain Superintendent of Polios, Superintendent of Victoria

1.

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.